In a globalised world it’s inevitable that
people will travel abroad for medical treatment. India is well-placed to
capitalise on this trend. It has world-class medical facilities and expertise
in many areas, and treatment costs can start at about a tenth of comparable
treatment in America or Britain. Even if one throws in airfare, it amounts to a
good bargain. According to a McKinsey-CII study, medical tourism could generate
as much as Rs 100 billion of revenue for India by 2012.
The notion that catering to foreigners and
rich Indians at expensive medical facilities is going to take away from health
care for the poor is entirely mistaken. These are private facilities whose
clients pay for their services, which doesn’t prevent the government from
setting up a first-rate public health system that takes care of everybody.
It’s wrong to look at medical care as a
zero-sum game. If India makes a success of medical tourism that will build
bigger capacities and draw more investment for the health sector. Indian
doctors who routinely travel abroad to look for work will be tempted to stay
back in India. Once the market signal goes out that there are more
opportunities for doctors, nurses and trained medical personnel, more young
people will opt for a career in these areas.
A booming health-care sector would also
spawn research and development in medical technologies, therapies and drugs in
India. The advantage of having a large medical R&D establishment is not
only that it would boost India’s competitive pharmaceutical industry, but also
that it would spur research into diseases — such as tuberculosis and malaria —
that afflicted Indians more. If India’s economy grows by an additional Rs 100
billion that generates a bigger tax base, giving the government enough leeway
to raise more revenue and invest it in public health. The government shouldn’t
look this gift horse in the mouth.
Move from medical tourism to medicine
It is absurd that a country that cannot
provide basic health to most of its citizens should try to be a hub for medical
tourism. Multi-speciality hospitals will cut into public health, unless the
government lays deliberate emphasis on the latter. Doctors will be weaned away
from specialising in ailments that concern the masses at large, such as
HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, malaria and gynaecological disorders, to concerns that
affect a section of people, such as obesity, plastic surgery and so on.
India’s growth story will mean very little,
if it does not translate into improvement in life expectancy and control of
killer diseases. For every 1,000 persons there is one hospital bed. Similarly,
there is one doctor for nearly 1,700. This is all the more distressing, given
the India’s health and morbidity indicators. TB claims 4,00,000 lives every
year. Infant mortality and maternal mortality rates, at 54 per 1,000 live
births and 301 for 1,00,000 live births, respectively, are higher than even
developing country levels, while life expectancy remains a laggard at 63. With
such a gross mismatch between demand and supply of health services, mass health
care must be awarded top priority.
Private hospitals should provide a certain
minimum number of free beds. As a case before the Delhi high court on this
issue argued, private hospitals are given land at below market rates, if not
free of charge, and are therefore bound by social obligations. It is in large
measure due to the shortage of government hospitals that health spending has
become a major cause of indebtedness. Medical tourism will accentuate the
shortage. Per capita state spending on health happens to be lowest in less
developed states, where, in fact, the demand for health services is acute.
Annual health spending of the Centre and states, at 1.39 per cent of gross domestic
product, is abysmal. The Centre and states should raise health expenditure at
least by three times to about Rs 1,70,000 crore per annum before they focus on
medical tourism.
Medical tourism or ‘Medical value tourism’?
Top-class
Indian doctors, a good mix of nursing, customer care services and treatment
cost estimated to be one-sixth in developing countries as compared to developed
countries, the Indian corporate hospitals are witnessing an emerging trend!
If a by-pass surgery costs $40,000 - 50,000
in the U.S., few Indian hospitals such as the Krishna Heart and Super Specialty
Institute in Ahmedabad have the wherewithal to do it in around 5,000 dollars.
Similarly if a joint replacement surgery costs $30,000 in U.S., the same would
be done by corporate hospitals in Ahmedabad at a roughly 6,500 dollars.
India, especially Ahmedabad is the most
touted healthcare destination for countries like South-East Asia, Middle East,
U.K., U.S., Africa and Tanzania. And the most sought-after specialties are
cardiology, joint replacement, gastroenterology, plastic, cosmetic and
laparoscopic surgeries.
“There are around 3.5 lakh people waiting
for treatment under the National Health scheme of U.K. The lower level workers
abroad are often not covered by insurance. Countries like Tanzania do not have
good medical expertise and nursing care. All of this has led to Ahmedabad
contributing
greatly to the medical tourism pie in the
country,” says Dr.Animish Choksi, Joint MD, at Krishna Heart Institute,
Ahmedabad. Expanding into Cardiology, Orthopedic Surgery, Laparoscopic and
Gastroenterology, Plastic Surgery, Cancer Surgery, Neuro Surgery, Urology
Treatment the institute comprises of 15% - 20% of NRI occupancy every
month.
Low costs and prompt email communication
convinced Gary Konkol to travel from Wisconsin to Ahmedabad for hip replacement
therapy at Krishna. “A hip replacement surgery requires a lot of assurance for
me to come to India and the treatment would have costed me six times more in
U.S.,” says Konkol. More than costs, Konkol feels the efficient nursing
standards of Indian hospitals are better than most of the U.S. hospitals.
Hansaben Patani, who underwent a knee replacement surgery at Krishna from
Tanzania, feels it was lack of good medical expertise that pushed her to come
to India.
Which explains, what more can be done for importance of accreditation in medical tourism? “Right from airport pick-up, to providing wheelchair to relieving the patient from anxiety regarding cleanliness, nursing care and transparency in business transactions, it is all about adding value to customer satisfaction. So it is more about ‘medical value tourism’ than medical tourism only,” Dr. Choksi concludes.
Which explains, what more can be done for importance of accreditation in medical tourism? “Right from airport pick-up, to providing wheelchair to relieving the patient from anxiety regarding cleanliness, nursing care and transparency in business transactions, it is all about adding value to customer satisfaction. So it is more about ‘medical value tourism’ than medical tourism only,” Dr. Choksi concludes.
No comments:
Post a Comment